<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 8.04 and Python Editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/</link>
	<description>Made with only the finest 1's and 0's</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu or Debian for programmers? (+ rant) &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-7724</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu or Debian for programmers? (+ rant) &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=294#comment-7724</guid>
		<description>[...] is officially Update5 (?!)  I was just reading some blog that compares Python editors in Ubuntu http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/0...ython-editors/ It basically says that most of them barely work or do not work (can&#039;t start, etc.)  I wouldn&#039;t be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is officially Update5 (?!)  I was just reading some blog that compares Python editors in Ubuntu <a href="http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/0...ython-editors/" rel="nofollow">http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/0&#8230;ython-editors/</a> It basically says that most of them barely work or do not work (can&#8217;t start, etc.)  I wouldn&#8217;t be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMC</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>JMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=294#comment-550</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m sorry, but NO editor, save maybe emacs, can touch Vim in the editing department. i challenge anyone to disprove this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sorry, but NO editor, save maybe emacs, can touch Vim in the editing department. i challenge anyone to disprove this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=294#comment-539</guid>
		<description>I use vim on Ubuntu and Windows. I first learned vi in 1984, and I&#039;ve always liked it. When vim became available on Windows I was very happy. I&#039;ve had periods where I&#039;ve used Emacs, but I have not been tempted that direction for a couple of years now because I&#039;ve become spoiled with font smoothing, which I can&#039;t get to work on Emacs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use vim on Ubuntu and Windows. I first learned vi in 1984, and I&#8217;ve always liked it. When vim became available on Windows I was very happy. I&#8217;ve had periods where I&#8217;ve used Emacs, but I have not been tempted that direction for a couple of years now because I&#8217;ve become spoiled with font smoothing, which I can&#8217;t get to work on Emacs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chombee</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>chombee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=294#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I find I&#039;ve stuck with a new(ish) and little-known GTK editor called Scribes, &quot;the little text editor that could.&quot; It has a really nice set of features, very thoughtfully chosen and implemented: automatic saving, auto-comple suggestions, automatic text replacements, snippets.

It is (for now, hopefully) missing a few features. Themes, and and the kind of auto-complete suggestions that allow you to discover methods that you haven&#039;t used before. (Scribes gets its auto-complete suggestions from words you&#039;ve typed to it before). For quick test and discovery, I use the iPython shell with scribes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find I&#8217;ve stuck with a new(ish) and little-known GTK editor called Scribes, &#8220;the little text editor that could.&#8221; It has a really nice set of features, very thoughtfully chosen and implemented: automatic saving, auto-comple suggestions, automatic text replacements, snippets.</p>
<p>It is (for now, hopefully) missing a few features. Themes, and and the kind of auto-complete suggestions that allow you to discover methods that you haven&#8217;t used before. (Scribes gets its auto-complete suggestions from words you&#8217;ve typed to it before). For quick test and discovery, I use the iPython shell with scribes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ycros</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2008/04/28/ubuntu-804-and-python-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Ycros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=294#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a long time Vim user, and I&#039;ve recently been using Emacs and sometimes Komodo (all for different languages), though I still use Vim for a quick edit here and there (that and Vim/VI are generally installed on all servers).

Two weeks ago I began a trial of Wing IDE and I love it. It&#039;s easy to change to a black background, you can switch to a VI &#039;Personality&#039; which makes the editing modal and changes the keybindings, and the debugging and autocompletion features are the best I&#039;ve come across (autocomplete for dynamic languages is hard!). It also shows you syntax errors on the fly, and integrates with PyLint.

I think I&#039;m going to be buying it when my trial runs out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long time Vim user, and I&#8217;ve recently been using Emacs and sometimes Komodo (all for different languages), though I still use Vim for a quick edit here and there (that and Vim/VI are generally installed on all servers).</p>
<p>Two weeks ago I began a trial of Wing IDE and I love it. It&#8217;s easy to change to a black background, you can switch to a VI &#8216;Personality&#8217; which makes the editing modal and changes the keybindings, and the debugging and autocompletion features are the best I&#8217;ve come across (autocomplete for dynamic languages is hard!). It also shows you syntax errors on the fly, and integrates with PyLint.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m going to be buying it when my trial runs out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
