<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bandwidth Delay Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/</link>
	<description>Made with only the finest 1's and 0's</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Billings</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/comment-page-1/#comment-7405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=454#comment-7405</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re concerned about network performance and SSH, and you have control over the SSH server and client, you might want to take a look at the SSH HPN patches: http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re concerned about network performance and SSH, and you have control over the SSH server and client, you might want to take a look at the SSH HPN patches: <a href="http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/" rel="nofollow">http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/comment-page-1/#comment-7403</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=454#comment-7403</guid>
		<description>@m0j0

That is an impressive amount of data / bandwidth to be dealing with. I&#039;m really looking forward to hearing about the rest of it :-) And you&#039;re very welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m0j0</p>
<p>That is an impressive amount of data / bandwidth to be dealing with. I&#8217;m really looking forward to hearing about the rest of it <img src='http://www.protocolostomy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  And you&#8217;re very welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0j0</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/comment-page-1/#comment-7402</link>
		<dc:creator>m0j0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=454#comment-7402</guid>
		<description>Right. I hope I was clear there about SSH being the worst possible tool for moving data where performance is important at all. I wish I could tell you that the actual project I&#039;m working on is as simple as upgrading the NIC and using FTP. Nope, the machines in question are doing long-haul, multi-terabyte transfers, and there&#039;s already 10GbE capability between the two (geographically dispersed) sites. While I *am* going to be mucking with some network performance tuning, the real bottleneck at this point appears to be disk -- or at least the client is resigned to the fact that they&#039;ll need new hardware (which might be a good thing) -- but it&#039;s early on in the project and I won&#039;t know more until I return from another project in a couple of weeks. I&#039;ll post as things progress, though, because for sure this will be the most data I&#039;ve ever had to move, over the biggest pipe I&#039;ve ever had access to (well, over the &#039;net anyway). 

Thanks for the links, btw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. I hope I was clear there about SSH being the worst possible tool for moving data where performance is important at all. I wish I could tell you that the actual project I&#8217;m working on is as simple as upgrading the NIC and using FTP. Nope, the machines in question are doing long-haul, multi-terabyte transfers, and there&#8217;s already 10GbE capability between the two (geographically dispersed) sites. While I *am* going to be mucking with some network performance tuning, the real bottleneck at this point appears to be disk &#8212; or at least the client is resigned to the fact that they&#8217;ll need new hardware (which might be a good thing) &#8212; but it&#8217;s early on in the project and I won&#8217;t know more until I return from another project in a couple of weeks. I&#8217;ll post as things progress, though, because for sure this will be the most data I&#8217;ve ever had to move, over the biggest pipe I&#8217;ve ever had access to (well, over the &#8216;net anyway). </p>
<p>Thanks for the links, btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/01/08/the-bandwidth-delay-product/comment-page-1/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=454#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>I had some issues with GbE lan speed a while back. You might find my posts interesting: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://standalone-sysadmin.blogspot.com/2008/10/answer-to-slow-speeds-from-last-week.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://standalone-sysadmin.blogspot.com/2008/10/answer-to-slow-speeds-from-last-week.html&lt;/a&gt;

When I took ssh out of the equation, my speeds more than tripled. I now transfer database images with FTP (over a private network, of course and do so in a fraction of the time my rsyncs took.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some issues with GbE lan speed a while back. You might find my posts interesting: </p>
<p><a href="http://standalone-sysadmin.blogspot.com/2008/10/answer-to-slow-speeds-from-last-week.html" rel="nofollow">http://standalone-sysadmin.blogspot.com/2008/10/answer-to-slow-speeds-from-last-week.html</a></p>
<p>When I took ssh out of the equation, my speeds more than tripled. I now transfer database images with FTP (over a private network, of course and do so in a fraction of the time my rsyncs took.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

