<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You Code, You Should Write</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/</link>
	<description>Made with only the finest 1's and 0's</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: php&#124;architect Podcast: Microphones in Bloom &#124; php&#124;architect</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/comment-page-1/#comment-36183</link>
		<dc:creator>php&#124;architect Podcast: Microphones in Bloom &#124; php&#124;architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=624#comment-36183</guid>
		<description>[...] If You Code, You Should Write [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If You Code, You Should Write [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0j0</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/comment-page-1/#comment-22950</link>
		<dc:creator>m0j0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=624#comment-22950</guid>
		<description>@Will -- good analogy. I have also described it as being sorta like music, since I also know that a lot of the programmers I meet are also musicians. You only have so many notes, but each instrument has physical attributes that make certain patterns, styles, tonal ranges, etc. easier to exploit. I play guitar primarily, but also play bass, piano, and have played wind instruments in the past. All have different strengths and make different things possible/easy. Picking an instrument is a little like picking a language. Or vice versa :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Will &#8212; good analogy. I have also described it as being sorta like music, since I also know that a lot of the programmers I meet are also musicians. You only have so many notes, but each instrument has physical attributes that make certain patterns, styles, tonal ranges, etc. easier to exploit. I play guitar primarily, but also play bass, piano, and have played wind instruments in the past. All have different strengths and make different things possible/easy. Picking an instrument is a little like picking a language. Or vice versa <img src='http://www.protocolostomy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0j0</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/comment-page-1/#comment-22949</link>
		<dc:creator>m0j0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=624#comment-22949</guid>
		<description>@Stu -- I certainly agree with your point, and it&#039;s a good one. Thanks for sharing. It would&#039;ve been good to include in this piece, but what I was really trying to do was speak a bit to the objections I&#039;ve heard from programmers to the act of writing. There seems to be some kind of phobia towards it amongst some subset of programmers that, from what I can tell, seems to be quite a *large* subset. I also didn&#039;t want the piece to be too long (and I tend to be long-winded). The first draft of this article had a huge section covering the different reasons programmers don&#039;t write, talking about how *editors* work, etc. I ripped it all out. If anyone wants to see that kind of thing, you can check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.protocolostomy.com/2007/07/19/why-you-should-write/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stu &#8212; I certainly agree with your point, and it&#8217;s a good one. Thanks for sharing. It would&#8217;ve been good to include in this piece, but what I was really trying to do was speak a bit to the objections I&#8217;ve heard from programmers to the act of writing. There seems to be some kind of phobia towards it amongst some subset of programmers that, from what I can tell, seems to be quite a *large* subset. I also didn&#8217;t want the piece to be too long (and I tend to be long-winded). The first draft of this article had a huge section covering the different reasons programmers don&#8217;t write, talking about how *editors* work, etc. I ripped it all out. If anyone wants to see that kind of thing, you can check out <a href="http://www.protocolostomy.com/2007/07/19/why-you-should-write/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/comment-page-1/#comment-22943</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=624#comment-22943</guid>
		<description>I have recently (at job interviews) been describing coding a bit like chemistry wherein you have a limited amount of elements (from the peridodic table) the same as you have a limited amount of expression, however, the art is in the combination of them to achieve success (and often things do not turn out how you expected to begin with).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently (at job interviews) been describing coding a bit like chemistry wherein you have a limited amount of elements (from the peridodic table) the same as you have a limited amount of expression, however, the art is in the combination of them to achieve success (and often things do not turn out how you expected to begin with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.protocolostomy.com/2009/09/09/if-you-code-you-should-write/comment-page-1/#comment-22941</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.protocolostomy.com/?p=624#comment-22941</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue what you&#039;re really advocating is a more general principle ... there comes a point in any individual&#039;s development in any art or skill where they need to be teaching in order to take the next step up in their own ability and understanding.  It&#039;s not something unique to programming by any means.

Best regards,
Stu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue what you&#8217;re really advocating is a more general principle &#8230; there comes a point in any individual&#8217;s development in any art or skill where they need to be teaching in order to take the next step up in their own ability and understanding.  It&#8217;s not something unique to programming by any means.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Stu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

